Why you feel behind on everything
Feeling behind on everything is almost never a problem with everything. It's usually one part of your life running short of something, and that shortage turns up in the other parts as well. That's why you can't name what's wrong. Finding the one underneath is a different job from trying harder at all of them.
It's 9:30 at night. The dishwasher's still full from this morning, you've been on your phone for forty minutes and you couldn't tell anybody what you looked at. Nothing's gone wrong today. You're not upset.
And you're behind on everything, same as you were yesterday.
That feeling is real. It's also no use to you, because it doesn't point anywhere in particular. Everything is the only place it points, and you can't start on everything.
What does it actually mean to feel behind?
Behind means behind a schedule. So it's worth asking what the schedule is.
Nobody hands it to you in writing. You pick it up in pieces. A friend's mum's house when you were fifteen. One comment somebody made once. A sibling who seems to have it sorted. What you assumed adults were supposed to have by now.
Then you mark yourself against it every day, for years, without ever having agreed to it. Most people describe this as everyone else getting a memo they didn't get.
Why can't you name which part?
Because the feeling arrives general and the cause is specific.
If money is short it doesn't stay in money. You say you're busy that weekend when the real answer is you can't do the sixty dollars, so the friendships go quiet. You lie awake doing sums, so there's nothing left of you at 3pm. Three areas look like they're failing and one thing is happening.
That's why advice aimed at your whole life has never once helped. It's aimed at all of it, and all of it isn't where the problem is.
Can you actually be behind on everything at once?
No, and that's the useful part.
Score ten areas of your life out of ten and take the lowest three. Ask each one what it would need to move up a single point. Not become a ten. One point. Nearly always the same answer turns up two or three times, and it's one of four things: time, energy, money, or another person actually being available.
Which means you're not failing at ten things. You're short of one thing, in ten places. That's arithmetic, not character.
Where did the timeline you're measuring against come from?
Every low score is a score out of something. You wrote a 3, and a 3 is out of a 10 you have a picture of.
That picture is fully furnished. You know what's on the bench, who's in the room, what time of day it is. What you've never written down is what the people in it actually had. Two incomes. One adult with time. A partner who did half of it.
You've been comparing your resources against their result.
What if the thing you're behind on isn't yours?
Write down where the standard came from and watch what turns up next. She's not a bad person. They did their best. Other people have it much worse. It's not like anything actually happened.
That sentence arrives to defend the standard, and how fast it turns up tells you how much it's protecting. Write it down and leave it there. It's information, not a correction.
Then there's the word you use on yourself about the area you scored lowest. Lazy, selfish, ungrateful, pathetic. Write the real one rather than the polite version, and then write down whose voice it's in.
How do you find the one underneath?
About twenty minutes with a pen.
Ten areas, scored honestly rather than impressively. Four rules that stop you writing the number you'd say out loud instead of the one that's true. Your three lowest checked against four questions each, which ask what you actually do rather than how you feel about it. Then the page that reads the shape and gives you one thing to start on.
That's the workbook. It's free, it's A4, and there's nothing to work out before you start.
You didn't get here by being lazy, and you didn't get here by failing at ten separate things at once. You got here carrying more than one person's share of it, with yourself last on the list, for years. That worked, which is the whole trouble with it.
You're allowed to write the honest numbers down tonight and do nothing else with them.
All the Questions
-
Because behind is a comparison, not a description. Nothing has to be wrong for you to be measuring your life against a timeline you never agreed to. The feeling is about the gap between where you are and a picture in your head, and the picture is usually somebody else's.
-
Honestly, no. It's usually credited to Paul J. Meyer in Texas around 1960, the sources contradict each other on both the date and the person, and there's essentially no research examining whether it works. It's a good way of getting what's already in your head onto a page where you can look at it. It isn't a test and it can't diagnose anything.
-
About twenty minutes. Ten to score all ten areas, and ten more to check your lowest three against the questions. You do not have to do the other seven sets, and doing all forty questions is how this ends up unfinished in a drawer.
-
It can be, and this workbook cannot tell you either way. If the flat feeling has been there most days for weeks, or you have stopped wanting things you used to want, that's a conversation for a GP rather than a worksheet. This is a way of working out where to put your effort, not an assessment of anything.
-
Ideally yes. There's something about writing a number by hand that stops you talking yourself out of it. It works on screen too, and the wheel page is the one worth printing if you're only printing one.
If any of this has opened up more than you expected, there are people you can talk to tonight. Lifeline 13 11 14 · 1800RESPECT 1800 737 732